The war with Iran delivered an unexpected boost to the U.S. oil industry. Higher prices improved profits, and the U.S. Energy Information Administration now expects production to approach 14 million barrels per day, a record level.

But stronger prices alone are unlikely to help the United States seize a larger share of Gulf oil markets, despite the disruption caused by the conflict.

Industry executives and investors say the U.S. oil sector has changed dramatically over the past decade. Major companies such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron are now focused on shareholder returns and financial discipline rather than aggressive production growth.

Details

• The U.S. Energy Information Administration has raised its production forecast to more than 14 million barrels per day in 2027, reflecting stronger prices and improved industry expectations.

• Despite higher oil prices, drilling activity remains relatively restrained. Baker Hughes data show only a modest increase in active drilling rigs in recent weeks.

• Analysts say U.S. producers face limits including labor shortages, equipment constraints, and a shrinking inventory of highly profitable drilling locations.

• Natural gas presents a different picture. U.S. LNG exports continue to grow, while buyers seek to diversify energy supplies after disruptions in the Gulf highlighted the risks of relying heavily on a single region.

• The International Energy Agency expects the global oil market to move toward surplus conditions by 2027 as supply recovers and Gulf exports return, even as demand growth remains weaker than historical averages.

• Many countries are also reassessing energy security strategies after the Strait of Hormuz crisis, expanding fuel reserves and reducing dependence on Gulf shipments.

Executives in the U.S. oilfield services sector say any meaningful gain in market share will depend largely on how quickly Gulf producers restore output and normal shipping operations.

What to watch

The key question is no longer how much oil the United States can produce, but how much demand will remain in the years ahead. As electric vehicle adoption accelerates and the global energy transition advances, producers may face a market where supply grows faster than consumption, even after Gulf disruptions fade.

The post U.S. Oil Companies Profit From the War — But Miss the Gulf Opportunity! appeared first on Ontime+.

Confusion over the status of the Strait of Hormuz deepened after Washington and Tehran offered sharply different accounts of whether the strategic waterway remains fully open to shipping.

While U.S. officials insist maritime traffic continues under American military monitoring, Iran has maintained that restricting access to the strait remains an option in response to what it describes as violations of the regional ceasefire framework tied to the ongoing conflict.

President Donald Trump said he warned Iranian officials during overnight contacts that closing the strait would carry severe consequences. His remarks came as Vice President JD Vance led a new round of talks with Iranian representatives in Switzerland.

On the ground, however, the picture appears less clear. Vessel-tracking data and maritime intelligence assessments indicate a decline in ship movements compared with previous days, as shipping companies and insurers weigh the risks created by conflicting messages from Washington and Tehran.

Daniel Mueller of maritime intelligence firm Ambrey said tensions remain high, noting that Iranian officials continue to describe the strait as closed despite the absence of new attacks on commercial vessels.

Another maritime intelligence company, Windward, reported a drop in crossings and said some ships appeared to be switching off tracking systems while passing through the area, making it harder to assess actual traffic levels.

U.S. Central Command, meanwhile, maintains that commercial shipping is continuing through the strait and that American forces are monitoring the situation to ensure safe passage. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright also said dozens of vessels had crossed the waterway in recent hours with assistance from U.S.-guided navigation routes.

Details

• Iran has linked any restrictions on shipping to continued Israeli operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

• Washington rejects claims that Tehran can fully shut down the waterway and says maritime traffic remains active.

• Global shipping operators continue to treat the area as a high-risk zone despite U.S. assurances.

• Any major disruption in the strait could affect roughly one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil trade.

What to watch

The key indicator in the coming days will not be political statements but actual shipping volumes. If vessel traffic continues to decline despite U.S. claims that the route remains open, the Strait of Hormuz could shift from a negotiating pressure point into a broader global energy concern.

The post Shipping Slows as Conflicting U.S. and Iranian Claims Cloud Strait of Hormuz appeared first on Ontime+.

For months, President Donald Trump sought to project confidence, insisting that oil prices, stock markets and political pressures were not shaping his decisions. But remarks at the G7 summit in France revealed a different calculation.

Defending the understanding reached with Tehran, Trump said he did not want to see an “economic catastrophe” if the war continued. The comment amounted to a rare admission that economic risks weighed heavily on the White House’s thinking.

For the administration, the issue had evolved beyond Iran or regional security. The bigger threat was the possibility that an energy crisis could trigger a broader global economic shock, hitting inflation, markets and growth at a politically sensitive moment in the United States.

Details

• The conflict created one of the largest energy disruptions in modern history. Industry estimates suggest that more than one billion barrels of global oil supply were lost during the war.

• Oil prices fell sharply after the agreement and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude, which surged above $120 a barrel at the height of the conflict, has since dropped below $85.

• Analysts caution that lower prices do not mean the problem has been solved. Much of the decline reflects optimism rather than the physical return of oil to the market. Restoring shipping routes, tanker operations and production capacity could take months.

• Concerns extend beyond future supply. Energy data show that both U.S. and global inventories have fallen significantly, reducing the market’s ability to absorb another major disruption.

• That helps explain why Trump’s warning about an “economic catastrophe” stood out. A president who often downplayed the importance of energy prices effectively acknowledged that a prolonged war risked triggering a wider economic crisis.

• Not everyone shares the gloomy outlook. Some analysts argue that higher OPEC production and the gradual return of Gulf exports could prevent severe shortages and keep prices under control despite lower inventories.

What to watch

The key question is no longer whether the war has ended, but whether oil supplies can return as quickly as markets expect.

If supply chains face delays or logistical problems, investors may discover that the agreement ended the fighting without fully resolving the energy crunch. If Gulf exports recover smoothly, however, the deal Trump defended as an economic necessity could become one of the main factors supporting global economic stability ahead of the U.S. midterm elections.

The post The Oil Threat Behind Trump’s Iran Deal appeared first on Ontime+.

Saudi Arabia is leading the first phase of the Strait of Hormuz recovery, with several giant crude carriers heading toward Asian markets after weeks of disruption.

The departures are being closely watched across global energy markets, where traders are looking for evidence that Gulf exports are returning to normal after tensions left dozens of tankers stranded inside the Gulf.

Details

• Vessel-tracking data showed several Saudi-linked very large crude carriers (VLCCs), including ships operated by Bahri, resuming voyages through Hormuz after reactivating their tracking systems.

• Bloomberg reported that dozens of crude carriers loaded with oil remain inside the Gulf and are preparing to depart, representing tens of millions of barrels that could reach Asian markets in the coming weeks.

• Saudi Arabia is viewed as the key test case for the reopening process, given its role as the region’s largest oil exporter and a major supplier to Asia.

• In Kuwait, Kuwait Petroleum Corporation CEO Sheikh Nawaf Al-Sabah said output is expected to exceed 2 million barrels per day within a week, with production gradually returning toward pre-crisis levels as shipping conditions improve.

• Kuwait was producing around 2.5 million barrels per day before the disruption, making its recovery another important signal for Gulf energy markets.

• The United Arab Emirates continues to benefit from export routes that bypass the Strait of Hormuz, helping cushion the impact of the disruption compared with some neighboring producers.

• Iranian media have also reported a gradual return of commercial activity at southern ports, including the arrival of cargo vessels and the departure of oil tankers.

Why it matters

This is about more than Saudi Arabia or Kuwait. Gulf producers account for a significant share of globally traded oil, and a sustained reopening of Hormuz could bring a large volume of crude back to international markets within a relatively short period.

That is why institutions including Goldman Sachs and Bank of America have begun forecasting a gradual recovery in Gulf exports and a reduced risk of supply shortages. Those expectations are already influencing oil prices and market sentiment.

What to watch

The key question is no longer whether tankers will move through Hormuz, but how quickly Saudi Arabia and other Gulf producers can restore exports to pre-crisis levels. If vessel traffic continues to rise in the coming days, fears of a supply shock could quickly give way to concerns about a fresh wave of oil entering the market.

The post Saudi Tankers Lead Hormuz Reopening as Gulf Oil Flows Head Back to Asia appeared first on Ontime+.

The most significant shift emerging from the U.S.-Iran détente may not be political. It could be happening on the region’s energy map.

Recent tensions highlighted the risks of relying heavily on traditional maritime routes. The uncertainty surrounding the Strait of Hormuz revived a long-standing question: what happens if one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints is disrupted?

That concern is pushing governments and energy companies to rethink their priorities. Instead of focusing solely on production, attention is increasingly turning to pipelines, rail links, and overland trade corridors connecting the Gulf to the Mediterranean and Europe.

Details

• Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Falih al-Zaidi and U.S. presidential envoy Tom Barrack discussed plans to rehabilitate the Kirkuk-Baniyas pipeline, which would connect northern Iraqi oil fields to Syria’s Mediterranean coast. The project is viewed as a potentially important alternative export route for Iraqi crude.

• Iraq is also seeking to strengthen exports through the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline to Turkey. The route has gained renewed importance as concerns grow over disruptions to southern export terminals, while Baghdad and Ankara continue discussions over the pipeline’s future framework.

• Iraq has already resumed exports from the Kirkuk fields through Ceyhan following understandings between Baghdad and Erbil, underscoring the growing push to diversify export channels.

• In the Eastern Mediterranean, regional cooperation on energy and infrastructure continues to expand. International investment is also increasing in offshore projects near Greece and Cyprus, alongside initiatives aimed at strengthening energy security and regional connectivity.

• Syria is gradually returning to regional economic calculations after years of isolation. Its geographic position makes it a potential transit hub linking the Gulf and Iraq with Turkey and European markets, reviving projects that had been dormant for decades.

What to watch

The next strategic competition in the Middle East may center less on oil fields and more on the routes that carry energy to consumers.

If projects such as Kirkuk-Baniyas and Kirkuk-Ceyhan move forward, alongside broader Eastern Mediterranean connectivity plans, the region could witness its most significant energy infrastructure realignment in decades. The recent conflict did not create these trends, but it appears to have accelerated them.

The post How the Middle East Is Rewiring Energy Routes? appeared first on Ontime+.

The first tangible signs of a potential return of Iranian oil exports to global markets have emerged after three Iran-linked tankers carrying nearly five million barrels of crude left the naval blockade zone in the Strait of Hormuz.

According to shipping data from Kpler, the sanctioned supertankers Diona and Hero 2, both owned by the National Iranian Tanker Company, departed carrying around 3.8 million barrels of Iranian crude. A third Iran-linked tanker left the area with roughly one million additional barrels.

The movements come days before the expected signing of a formal agreement between the United States and Iran in Geneva, following a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending months of confrontation between the two countries.

Michelle Wiese Bockmann, senior maritime intelligence analyst at Windward, said the departures could signal that other vessels involved in Iranian oil trade are preparing to resume operations.

Details

• Markets expect the upcoming agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping and ease restrictions on Iranian oil exports.

• The waterway, which handles a significant share of global oil trade, has experienced major disruptions in recent months, driving up shipping and insurance costs.

• Some shipping companies have already started redirecting vessels toward Gulf ports in anticipation of stronger demand for transport and refueling services.

• Most operators, however, remain in wait-and-see mode, concerned that the current de-escalation could prove temporary rather than a full return to normal conditions.

• Marine insurers have indicated they will not reduce war-risk premiums until clearer evidence emerges that shipping routes are stable and secure.

• Windward reported that dozens of very large crude carriers are already heading toward ports in the United Arab Emirates, while others remain outside the region awaiting greater clarity.

• Restrictions on maritime traffic remain in place pending the formal signing of the agreement, and U.S. authorities have reportedly advised the shipping industry that current navigation procedures remain unchanged for now.

• Kpler estimates that more than 100 loaded tankers could leave the region within two weeks of the agreement taking effect, potentially triggering a sharp but short-term surge in exports.

What to watch

The real test will not be the departure of a handful of tankers but how quickly normal shipping traffic returns to the Strait of Hormuz after the agreement is signed. If insurance risks ease and major shipping companies return, global energy markets could soon face a significant influx of Iranian crude.

The post Hormuz Tests a Comeback as Iranian Oil Tankers Break the Standoff appeared first on Ontime+.

The latest

The U.S.-Iran deal may calm the Strait of Hormuz, but it does not erase the deeper shift the crisis forced on global oil markets.

Energy analysts and shipping executives say the past several months have redrawn trade flows. The issue is no longer only whether a key waterway reopens. It is whether major buyers still trust the Gulf as their main source of supply.

President Donald Trump said Monday that a memorandum of understanding with Iran had been finalized, sending oil prices down by about 5%. But experts cited by the Associated Press said it could take months for Middle East shipping and production to return to pre-war levels.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects old trade patterns to recover fully only by late 2026 or early 2027.

Details

• During the Hormuz crisis, buyers in Asia and Europe turned to alternative routes and signed longer-term deals with producers outside the Gulf.

• The BBC reported that the strait handled about 26 crude tankers a day before the war. That level is not expected to return immediately.

• BIMCO data showed crude tanker exports from the Americas reaching a record 14.5 million barrels per day in May.

• BIMCO described the shift as structural. It had been building for years, but the Hormuz crisis accelerated it.

• Reuters reported that U.S. crude and fuel exports rose to about 10.5 million barrels per day in May, making the country the world’s top exporter for a third straight month.

• South America played a central role in the surge. Brazil, Guyana and Venezuela shipped about 145 million additional barrels in 2026 compared with the same period a year earlier.

• The EIA expects Brazil’s production to reach 4 million barrels per day in 2026.

• Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale formation is also expected to lift output to about 810,000 barrels per day.

A new energy geography

The crisis is no longer just a temporary stress test for supply chains.

Asia Times reported that the Americas could produce about 30 million barrels of oil per day later in 2026. That would put the region close to OPEC’s pre-war production levels.

Before the conflict, the International Energy Agency had projected that nearly all global demand growth in 2026 could be met by supply from the Americas alone.

Frontline CEO Lars Barstad told CNBC that shipping through the strait could resume quickly if the deal holds. But he said traffic is unlikely to return soon to pre-war levels of 130 to 140 vessel crossings a day.

For buyers that spent months reducing their exposure to the Gulf, the incentive to reverse course may no longer be strong.

What to watch

The real test is not just whether Hormuz reopens. It is whether major buyers return to the Gulf on the same terms as before, or keep leaning on their new contracts in the Americas.

For now, the crisis appears to have changed more than prices. It has changed the way oil buyers think about risk, supply and trust.

The post Will the Iran Deal Rewrite the Old Oil Map? appeared first on Ontime+.

Tanker companies and shipping operators are preparing for a possible rebound in traffic through the Strait of Hormuz as diplomatic signals point to a potential U.S.-Iran deal to reopen the vital waterway.

Lars Barstad, the CEO of Frontline, told CNBC that transits through Hormuz could jump sharply if a credible agreement is reached. But he cautioned that previous breakthroughs have appeared close before, only to fall apart.

Barstad said the strait is currently seeing only 5 to 10 vessel crossings a day, compared with 130 to 140 before the war.

Details

• Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps effectively blocked the Strait of Hormuz after U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran began on Feb. 28, turning one of the world’s most important energy corridors into a high-risk chokepoint.

• Roughly a quarter of global oil flows through the strait, making any prolonged disruption a direct threat to energy and shipping markets.

• Since the closure, hundreds of vessels have remained trapped inside the Gulf, while more tankers have sailed “dark” by switching off tracking systems to reduce the risk of detection or attack.

• President Donald Trump said the U.S. Navy secretly helped 200 commercial vessels and more than 100 million barrels of oil move through the strait over the past month.

• Estimates of current flows vary widely. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright put them at about 7 million barrels a day, while JPMorgan estimated slightly more than 5 million barrels a day.

• A U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding has been under negotiation for weeks, with Qatar mediating between the two sides.

• The proposed framework would extend the ceasefire for 60 days. Under it, Iran would remove mines from the strait and allow shipping to return to prewar levels in exchange for an easing of the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports.

• Iranian officials have repeatedly said Tehran has not agreed to every provision. Disputes over uranium enrichment also remain unresolved.

• Shipping analysts warn that a formal reopening could trigger a sudden rush of vessels through the strait.

• That could release large volumes of oil trapped inside the Gulf into global markets in a short period.

• Recent estimates showed that roughly two-thirds of outbound tankers used shadow-fleet tactics to pass through the strait in May, up from 37% in the first month of the war.

• A return to normal shipping could weigh on oil prices if the accumulated barrels reach buyers at the same time.

• Barstad said shipowners are positioning for the moment the risk level drops. “The minute the tide turns,” he said, transits would resume in force.

What to watch

The first test is whether a U.S.-Iran deal looks credible and enforceable. If it does, shipping companies could move quickly to restore routes through Hormuz. But if the terms remain vague, or if the nuclear dispute keeps blocking progress, traffic may stay limited, with tankers continuing to rely on dark transits and alternative routes.

Source: CNBC

The post Could Hormuz traffic surge once a deal is signed? appeared first on Ontime+.

Kuwait appears to have joined a growing group of Gulf oil and gas producers moving energy cargoes through the Strait of Hormuz using vessels that switch off their tracking systems during transit.

Ship-tracking data reviewed by Bloomberg showed that the LPG tanker Umm Al Ruwaisat, owned by Kuwait National Petroleum Company, crossed the strait in recent days before transferring its cargo to another vessel now heading to an Indian port.

Details

• The tanker loaded LPG cargo in the Gulf in May before disabling its Automatic Identification System (AIS) during the voyage.

• The vessel reappeared in tracking data near India’s coast later this week.

• The case is the latest example of energy tankers operating in “dark mode” while crossing the Strait of Hormuz.

• Iraq and other Gulf producers have increasingly relied on tankers that switch off tracking systems while transporting crude oil, LNG and LPG in recent weeks.

• Since the war began on February 28, tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has fallen by an estimated 90% to 95% from pre-war levels, disrupting global energy flows.

• Some cargoes continue to move through the waterway, but under increasingly opaque operating conditions that make it difficult to determine how much oil and gas is actually reaching buyers.

• Energy-tracking firms say dark-shipping tactics, once primarily associated with Iranian vessels seeking to evade sanctions, have become common across a large share of commercial traffic passing through the strait.

What to watch

If more exporters adopt dark-shipping practices, visibility into Gulf energy exports could deteriorate further, complicating efforts to assess global oil and gas supply levels.

The post Kuwait Joins Dark Shipping Through Hormuz! appeared first on Ontime+.

The Washington Post said Qatar tried to protect its most valuable economic asset through secret talks with Iran at the start of the war.

The target was Ras Laffan, the vast gas complex that sits at the heart of Qatar’s economy and plays a major role in global LNG supply.

According to Middle Eastern security officials and Western officials briefed on intelligence, Doha approached Tehran with a possible understanding: Iran would avoid striking Ras Laffan, and Qatar would shut down gas production unilaterally.

The move would have sent a shock through global energy markets. It also could have raised economic pressure on the United States and Israel to shorten the war.

One senior regional security official described the outreach as a “secret deal.” Another official said Qatar’s message to Iran was that Tehran could achieve its goals without hitting Qatari territory.

Qatar did not secure a firm commitment from Iran, according to the report.

Still, Doha shut down Ras Laffan on the third day of the war as Iranian missiles and drones targeted sites across the Gulf. Qatar said at the time the decision followed military attacks on operating facilities. The Washington Post said satellite images it reviewed later showed no obvious damage at Ras Laffan during that initial shutdown.

Qatar strongly rejected the report.

Its international media office told the newspaper that any suggestion its energy decisions were made in coordination with Iran, for Iran’s benefit, or to influence the course of the war was “categorically false.”

Doha said the allegation was meant to damage Qatar’s reputation, undermine its mediation role and strain its strategic partnership with the United States.

Details

• The Washington Post said the alleged Qatari outreach was detected through monitoring of Iranian leadership communications.

• Security officials said Qatar was trying to avoid damage to Ras Laffan that could take years to repair.

• Ras Laffan is one of the world’s most important gas facilities and a central pillar of Qatar’s economy.

• Qatar shut the complex in the war’s early days, before other Gulf states took similar steps.

• Qatari officials warned at the time that the war could disrupt global energy markets.

• The newspaper said satellite imagery showed no clear damage at Ras Laffan during the first shutdown.

• Qatar said the shutdown was based on military threat assessments and concern for workers and infrastructure.

• Around two weeks later, Iran did strike Ras Laffan after Israeli attacks damaged Iranian gas infrastructure.

• The later attack caused visible damage to an LNG facility, according to satellite images cited by the newspaper.

• Qatar’s energy minister said the damage affected infrastructure tied to nearly 20% of Qatar’s LNG exports and could take three to five years to repair.

What to watch

The report shows how Gulf states have tried to survive a war they did not start and cannot fully control.

Qatar was in an especially exposed position: a mediator between Washington and Tehran, a major U.S. security partner, and a neighbor that shares the world’s largest gas field with Iran.

If The Washington Post’s account is accurate, Doha was acting first to protect itself, even if that complicated U.S. and Israeli war aims.

If Qatar’s denial is accurate, the shutdown was a defensive move driven by the risk to workers and critical infrastructure.

Either way, Ras Laffan is no longer just an energy site. It has become one of the pressure points of the war.

The post Qatar’s secret gas gamble with Iran! appeared first on Ontime+.